美刊称使用呼吸机患者死亡率达88% 医学专家急了

近日，美国知名医学期刊《美国医学会杂志》（JAMA）刊登了一篇十分吓人的论文。

这篇研究了美国纽约市5700名新冠肺炎住院患者的论文宣称，他们统计发现，使用呼吸机的患者，其死亡率高达88%！

结果，此事也很快被众多西方媒体报道，并震惊了舆论。

但不少看到了这篇论文的医学专家却指出，这个数字存在严重的误导。

下图，便是那篇宣称纽约市使用呼吸机的新冠肺炎患者死亡率高达88%的论文。

ink="%7B%22cover%22%3A%22%22%2C%22desc%22%3A%22%22%2C%22id%22%3A%229o27on_243529%22%2C%22size%22%3A42.82%2C%22width%22%3A934%2C%22height%22%3A428%2C%22url%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Frs1.huanqiucdn.cn/dp/api/images%2FimageDir%2F4b5539b872734d237a6f8fa6ae389f16.png%22%2C%22tags%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22time%22%3A%22%22%2C%22mime%22%3A%22%22%7D" src="http://img.okhy.cn/202004/26/123301511.png" style="margin: 0px auto; display: block;" />

ink="%7B%22cover%22%3A%22%22%2C%22desc%22%3A%22%22%2C%22id%22%3A%22xsdnbw_9735%22%2C%22size%22%3A598.9%2C%22width%22%3A912%2C%22height%22%3A440%2C%22url%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Frs1.huanqiucdn.cn/dp/api/images%2FimageDir%2Fb5a60c45b6993337913e714ddff6d3f8.png%22%2C%22tags%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22time%22%3A%22%22%2C%22mime%22%3A%22%22%7D" src="http://img.okhy.cn/202004/26/123301281.png" style="margin: 0px auto; display: block;" />

这一令人震惊的数字，也很快被大量西方媒体报道，比如美国彭博社和英国的《独立报》。

ink="%7B%22cover%22%3A%22%22%2C%22desc%22%3A%22%22%2C%22id%22%3A%22iyrubj_597336%22%2C%22size%22%3A375.24%2C%22width%22%3A1080%2C%22height%22%3A485%2C%22url%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Frs1.huanqiucdn.cn/dp/api/images%2FimageDir%2Ffd51f4228c2f48a6bf7c7a1280dede11.png%22%2C%22tags%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22time%22%3A%22%22%2C%22mime%22%3A%22%22%7D" src="http://img.okhy.cn/202004/26/123301611.png" style="margin: 0px auto; display: block;" />

ink="%7B%22cover%22%3A%22%22%2C%22desc%22%3A%22%22%2C%22id%22%3A%22xsmnz4_792632%22%2C%22size%22%3A40.47%2C%22width%22%3A991%2C%22height%22%3A292%2C%22url%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Frs1.huanqiucdn.cn/dp/api/images%2FimageDir%2Fc4af3de0c95d8d2ce53457cd1805e158.png%22%2C%22tags%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22time%22%3A%22%22%2C%22mime%22%3A%22%22%7D" src="http://img.okhy.cn/202004/26/123301571.png" style="margin: 0px auto; display: block;" />

然而，在刊登了这篇论文的美国知名医学期刊《美国医学会杂志》（JAMA）的官方网站上，多名医学专家却表示这个数字存在严重的误导性，并要求期刊方面联系作者进行更正。

ink="%7B%22cover%22%3A%22%22%2C%22desc%22%3A%22%22%2C%22id%22%3A%22sv2m6u_40726%22%2C%22size%22%3A11%2C%22width%22%3A843%2C%22height%22%3A365%2C%22url%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Frs1.huanqiucdn.cn/dp/api/images%2FimageDir%2F6d15e8b7ae8593986588f3c84b2f3bf5.png%22%2C%22tags%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22time%22%3A%22%22%2C%22mime%22%3A%22%22%7D" src="http://img.okhy.cn/202004/26/123301621.png" style="margin: 0px auto; display: block;" />

ink="%7B%22cover%22%3A%22%22%2C%22desc%22%3A%22%22%2C%22id%22%3A%2247jp3a_475427%22%2C%22size%22%3A18.93%2C%22width%22%3A856%2C%22height%22%3A377%2C%22url%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Frs1.huanqiucdn.cn/dp/api/images%2FimageDir%2Ff803b9a5f28197a0adbf64f000a89b50.png%22%2C%22tags%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22time%22%3A%22%22%2C%22mime%22%3A%22%22%7D" src="http://img.okhy.cn/202004/26/123301741.png" style="margin: 0px auto; display: block;" />

原来，这些医学专家发现，这篇论文是将那些使用呼吸机后死亡或出院的病人进行了对比：其中出院的38人，死亡的282人，由此算出使用呼吸机的住院病人死亡率高达88%的数字（282/38+282）。

然而，该论文的样本中还有831名病人仍在住院并正在使用呼吸机进行治疗。但似乎是由于这800多名病人还没有出院或死亡，这篇论文的研究人员竟然没将他们统计进去，这才出现了那么高的死亡率数字。

ink="%7B%22cover%22%3A%22%22%2C%22desc%22%3A%22%22%2C%22id%22%3A%2240ra99_499734%22%2C%22size%22%3A314%2C%22width%22%3A1080%2C%22height%22%3A540%2C%22url%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Frs1.huanqiucdn.cn/dp/api/images%2FimageDir%2F335337fe564ba39c93ddee18a8f4c179.png%22%2C%22tags%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22time%22%3A%22%22%2C%22mime%22%3A%22%22%7D" src="http://img.okhy.cn/202004/26/123301491.png" style="margin: 0px auto; display: block;" />

目前，《美国医学会杂志》已经更正了这一数字。其编辑人员也在论文的评论区留言感谢了医学专家们指出的错误。

更正后的论文在此处的最新表述为：在需要使用呼吸机的病人中，38人（3.3%）已经出院，282人死亡（24.5%），还有831人（72.2%）仍在住院。

ink="%7B%22cover%22%3A%22%22%2C%22desc%22%3A%22%22%2C%22id%22%3A%22dq6do1_412231%22%2C%22size%22%3A23.6%2C%22width%22%3A889%2C%22height%22%3A482%2C%22url%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Frs1.huanqiucdn.cn/dp/api/images%2FimageDir%2F890582c82799cb994101c7cf517a05e9.png%22%2C%22tags%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22time%22%3A%22%22%2C%22mime%22%3A%22%22%7D" src="http://img.okhy.cn/202004/26/123301211.png" style="margin: 0px auto; display: block;" />

不过，在境外的社交平台推特上，一些医学人士仍对《美国医学会杂志》出现这样的疏漏感到不解……

ink="%7B%22cover%22%3A%22%22%2C%22desc%22%3A%22%22%2C%22id%22%3A%2273mt2n_388933%22%2C%22size%22%3A43.85%2C%22width%22%3A592%2C%22height%22%3A306%2C%22url%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Frs1.huanqiucdn.cn/dp/api/images%2FimageDir%2F3e268c2600f707410dbf76be1b0c8c5f.png%22%2C%22tags%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22time%22%3A%22%22%2C%22mime%22%3A%22%22%7D" src="http://img.okhy.cn/202004/26/123301991.png" style="margin: 0px auto; display: block;" />